↓ Skip to main content

Observation and confirmation of nine strong-lensing systems in Dark Energy Survey Year 1 data

Overview of attention for article published in Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
15 X users

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Observation and confirmation of nine strong-lensing systems in Dark Energy Survey Year 1 data
Published in
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, January 2020
DOI 10.1093/mnras/staa200
Authors

B Nord, E Buckley-Geer, H Lin, N Kuropatkin, T Collett, D L Tucker, H T Diehl, A Agnello, A Amara, T M C Abbott, S Allam, J Annis, S Avila, K Bechtol, D Brooks, D L Burke, A Carnero Rosell, M Carrasco Kind, J Carretero, C E Cunha, L N da Costa, C Davis, J De Vicente, P Doel, T F Eifler, A E Evrard, E Fernandez, B Flaugher, P Fosalba, J Frieman, J García-Bellido, E Gaztanaga, D Gruen, R A Gruendl, G Gutierrez, W G Hartley, D L Hollowood, K Honscheid, B Hoyle, D J James, K Kuehn, O Lahav, M Lima, M A G Maia, M March, J L Marshall, P Melchior, F Menanteau, R Miquel, A A Plazas, A K Romer, A Roodman, E S Rykoff, E Sanchez, V Scarpine, R Schindler, M Schubnell, I Sevilla-Noarbe, M Smith, M Soares-Santos, F Sobreira, E Suchyta, M E C Swanson, G Tarle, D Thomas, Y Zhang,

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 45%
Researcher 3 27%
Student > Postgraduate 1 9%
Unknown 2 18%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 8 73%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 9%
Unknown 2 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2019.
All research outputs
#2,822,989
of 32,627,473 outputs
Outputs from Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
#3,775
of 43,822 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,564
of 507,406 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
#78
of 775 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,627,473 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 43,822 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 507,406 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 775 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.