Is Automated Journalistic Writing Less Biased? An Experimental Test of Auto-Written and Human-Written News Stories

Overview of attention for article published in Journalism Practice, October 2019

Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#5 of 1,556)
High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs: 2 blogs
twitter: 332 X users
facebook: 1 Facebook page

reddit: 1 Redditor
q&a: 1 Q&A thread

Readers on

mendeley: 80 Mendeley

So far, Altmetric has seen 362 X posts from 332 X users, with an upper bound of 5,051,514 followers.

where is the truth? where are we? maybe a sonar would help in this darkness (look up sperm whales on wikipedia) https://t.co/BYHuBkJpld

https://t.co/2Quot2TKu8

@DegenRolf 8⃣8⃣ As notícias escritas por um algoritmo são classificadas como mais objectivas, credíveis e menos tendenciosas do que as escritas por jornalistas reais. https://t.co/tWnPmKD6ko https://t.co/9aHEmo8bMV

Open Access Moment: How do readers assess #automatic journalistic #writing comparable to #human writing? How does the standard of journalistic quality evolve in the #internet age? Answers here by @yanfang_wu https://t.co/120kH3tvph https://t.co/BWJx2szFzc

This page shows the most recent X posts that mention this research output. Click here to find out how to access more activity, including 358 additional X posts.