Amino acid starvation by asparaginase (ASNase) enhances phosphorylation of eukaryotic initiation factor 2 (eIF2) by general control nonderepressible 2 (GCN2) kinase, leading to reduced global mRNA translation rates. This conserves energy and allows cells time to reprogram stress-related gene expression to alleviate cell injury. This study addressed the importance of GCN2 for the immune system to adapt to amino acid starvation by ASNase. GCN2(+/+) and GCN2(-/-) mice were injected once daily with ASNase or saline for up to 7 d. In both thymus and spleen, activation of amino acid stress response genes to ASNase, such as asparagine synthetase and CAAT enhancer binding protein homologous protein, required GCN2. ASNase reduced food intake and body weight in both genotypes, but spleen and thymus wet weights and total cell numbers in thymus, spleen, bone marrow, and mesenteric lymph nodes were less in GCN2(-/-) mice treated with ASNase (genotype x ASNase, P < 0.05). In the thymus, GCN2(-/-) mice treated with ASNase demonstrated enhanced apoptosis and fewer cells in all subpopulations examined (CD3+, CD4-8-, CD4+8+, CD4+8-, CD4-8+) compared with GCN2(+/+) mice treated with ASNase (genotype x ASNase, P < 0.05). In the spleen, GCN2 deletion magnified ASNase-induced reductions in CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, CD19+ B cells, and CD11b+ leukocytes (genotype x ASNase, P < 0.05). These results indicate that loss of GCN2 enhances immunosuppression by ASNase and that this eIF2 kinase is broadly required for amino acid stress management in the immune system.
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2024.
All research outputs
#10,710,787
of 34,358,242 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nutrition
#6,413
of 12,837 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,727
of 152,741 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nutrition
#41
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,358,242 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,837 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.7. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 152,741 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
