↓ Skip to main content

MR of the cauda equina.

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Neuroradiology, January 1987
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
MR of the cauda equina.
Published in
American Journal of Neuroradiology, January 1987
Pubmed ID
Authors

A Monajati, W S Wayne, W Rauschning, S E Ekholm

Abstract

To define the anatomy of the cauda equina nerve roots by MR imaging, the lower spine of 14 normal volunteers was imaged using a high-field surface-coil technique. A total of 56 sagittal and 56 axial MR sections (eight selected slices from each case) were correlated with undistorted anatomic sections from cadaver spine specimens, and the visualization of the nerve roots was assessed. In addition, MR images of three patients with infiltrating or seeding tumors affecting the cauda equina were analyzed. Seventy-eight percent of the MR sections from normal cases clearly showed the anatomy of the cauda equina nerve roots. The nerve roots were fairly shown in 17% of the sections; and false findings (presumably caused by CSF pulsation) were observed in the remaining 5%. Coronal imaging provided excellent anatomic views of the nerve roots within the intervertebral foramina. Morphologic alterations in the pathologic cases were correctly shown when both T1- and T2-weighted imaging were used. In conclusion, MR proved efficient in viewing the cauda equina region.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 27%
Other 1 9%
Professor 1 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 9%
Student > Master 1 9%
Other 1 9%
Unknown 3 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 55%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 9%
Neuroscience 1 9%
Engineering 1 9%
Unknown 2 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2024.
All research outputs
#19,855,890
of 24,401,594 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Neuroradiology
#4,363
of 5,105 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,784
of 47,146 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Neuroradiology
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,401,594 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,105 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 47,146 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.