↓ Skip to main content

日本における食物アレルギー患者数の推計:疫学調査の現状と課題

Overview of attention for article published in Arerugī Allergy, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
日本における食物アレルギー患者数の推計:疫学調査の現状と課題
Published in
Arerugī Allergy, July 2018
DOI 10.15036/arerugi.67.767
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yuri Matsubara, Ryusuke Ae, Yukihiro Ohya, Hiroshi Akiyama, Takanori Imai, Kenji Matsumoto, Tatsuki Fukuie, Yasuko Aoyama, Nobuko Makino, Yosikazu Nakamura, Hirohisa Saito

Abstract

The number of patients with food allergy in Japan is increasing year by year, although the precise prevalence of them is not clear. We aimed to determine the estimated number of people with food allergies in Japan and produce new methods of the investigation of them. We determined the number of people with food allergies using government data and statistics such as demographic statistic and the number of students. In infants, the number of patients with a food allergy was 800000 as per the self-reported prevalence; however, as per the physician's diagnoses, 300000-500000 of them had a food allergy. In students, the selfreported number was 600000, while 350000 cases were diagnosed by physicians. In adults, the consumer agency investigated the patients who visited the hospital with the immediate hypersensitivity. In this study, the participants were limited to patients who visited the hospital. This made the estimation of the overall prevalence of food allergy in Japan. For children, if we add the questionnaire to the existing study, which questions them regarding the symptoms of food allergy, the diagnosis by the physician, and the blood test, we can better investigate the prevalence of food allergies and changing pattern by the year. In adults, we propose that future investigations consisting of the National Health and Nutrition Survey and a comprehensive survey of living conditions should be conducted, because few studies have reported on food allergies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 25%
Student > Master 2 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 17%
Professor 1 8%
Unknown 4 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 17%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 5 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 January 2021.
All research outputs
#15,484,736
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Arerugī Allergy
#171
of 489 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#182,017
of 341,739 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arerugī Allergy
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 489 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,739 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them