↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of the NCCN‐IPI, the IPI and PIT scores as prognostic tools in peripheral T‐cell lymphomas

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of Haematology, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
guideline
1 clinical guideline source

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Comparison of the NCCN‐IPI, the IPI and PIT scores as prognostic tools in peripheral T‐cell lymphomas
Published in
British Journal of Haematology, March 2019
DOI 10.1111/bjh.15859
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 3 12%
Student > Postgraduate 3 12%
Researcher 2 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 15 60%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 4%
Chemistry 1 4%
Unknown 16 64%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2022.
All research outputs
#8,024,075
of 27,145,244 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Haematology
#3,422
of 9,342 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#134,470
of 367,818 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Haematology
#54
of 121 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,145,244 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,342 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,818 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 121 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.