↓ Skip to main content

Reflections of the changes in patent ductus arteriosus management during the last 10 years

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Disease in Childhood -- Fetal & Neonatal Edition, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
97 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Reflections of the changes in patent ductus arteriosus management during the last 10 years
Published in
Archives of Disease in Childhood -- Fetal & Neonatal Edition, April 2016
DOI 10.1136/archdischild-2014-306214
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Despite a large body of scientific evidence on the management of premature infants with a patent ductus arteriosus controversy remains and neonatologists remain challenged for knowing which patient to treat, what is the most optimal timing of treatment and which treatments have a positive impact on both short-term and long-term outcomes. In this review article we discuss the increased body of evidence over the past 10 years, much of which questions the role of treatment and suggests the need to reconsider how haemodynamic significance is adjudicated. In addition, we discuss novel approaches to assessment and diagnosis, and highlight areas for future investigation.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Denmark 1 1%
Unknown 96 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 14 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 14%
Student > Postgraduate 10 10%
Student > Master 9 9%
Researcher 8 8%
Other 21 22%
Unknown 21 22%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 60 62%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 1%
Mathematics 1 1%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 1%
Other 3 3%
Unknown 29 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2016.
All research outputs
#22,071,229
of 34,410,315 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Disease in Childhood -- Fetal & Neonatal Edition
#2,020
of 2,708 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#192,903
of 336,940 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Disease in Childhood -- Fetal & Neonatal Edition
#23
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,410,315 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,708 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 336,940 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.