↓ Skip to main content

Tobacco Branding, Plain Packaging, Pictorial Warnings, and Symbolic Consumption

Overview of attention for article published in Qualitative Health Research, December 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
4 policy sources
twitter
5 X users
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
99 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Tobacco Branding, Plain Packaging, Pictorial Warnings, and Symbolic Consumption
Published in
Qualitative Health Research, December 2011
DOI 10.1177/1049732311431070
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

We use brand association and symbolic consumption theory to explore how plain cigarette packaging would influence the identities young adults cocreate with tobacco products. Group discussions and in-depth interviews with 86 young adult smokers and nonsmokers investigated how participants perceive tobacco branding and plain cigarette packaging with larger health warnings. We examined the transcript data using thematic analysis and explored how removing tobacco branding and replacing this with larger warnings would affect the symbolic status of tobacco brands and their social connotations. Smokers used tobacco brand imagery to define their social attributes and standing, and their connection with specific groups. Plain cigarette packaging usurped this process by undermining aspirational connotations and exposing tobacco products as toxic. Replacing tobacco branding with larger health warnings diminishes the cachet brand insignia creates, weakens the social benefits brands confer on users, and represents a potentially powerful policy measure.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
New Zealand 1 1%
Malaysia 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Unknown 94 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 18%
Researcher 13 13%
Student > Bachelor 11 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 8%
Student > Postgraduate 7 7%
Other 21 21%
Unknown 21 21%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 17 17%
Business, Management and Accounting 16 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 16%
Psychology 10 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 4%
Other 8 8%
Unknown 28 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 September 2020.
All research outputs
#2,049,479
of 34,583,980 outputs
Outputs from Qualitative Health Research
#152
of 2,182 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,107
of 305,201 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Qualitative Health Research
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,583,980 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,182 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,201 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.