↓ Skip to main content

Platform values and democratic elections: How can the law regulate digital disinformation?

Overview of attention for article published in Computer Law & Security Review, April 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#34 of 538)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
44 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
61 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
387 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Platform values and democratic elections: How can the law regulate digital disinformation?
Published in
Computer Law & Security Review, April 2020
DOI 10.1016/j.clsr.2019.105373
Authors

Chris Marsden, Trisha Meyer, Ian Brown

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 44 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 387 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 387 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 50 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 9%
Student > Bachelor 30 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 5%
Researcher 17 4%
Other 62 16%
Unknown 175 45%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 71 18%
Computer Science 35 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 32 8%
Engineering 17 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 14 4%
Other 40 10%
Unknown 178 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2021.
All research outputs
#1,277,356
of 25,722,279 outputs
Outputs from Computer Law & Security Review
#34
of 538 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,657
of 397,888 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Computer Law & Security Review
#2
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,722,279 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 538 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 397,888 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.