↓ Skip to main content

Acute demyelinating lesions with restricted diffusion in multiple sclerosis

Overview of attention for article published in Multiple Sclerosis Journal, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
guideline
1 clinical guideline source

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Acute demyelinating lesions with restricted diffusion in multiple sclerosis
Published in
Multiple Sclerosis Journal, April 2012
DOI 10.1177/1352458512445407
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

It is widely accepted that typical acute demyelinating lesions in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) exhibit vasogenic edema with increased diffusion, as demonstrated by an increased apparent diffusion coefficient on MRI. In contrast, acute ischemic lesions demonstrate cytotoxic edema with restricted diffusion. Recent reports have documented selected cases of acute demyelinating lesions exhibiting restricted diffusion (ADLRD) in MS. We aimed to assess the morphologies, distributions, signal characteristics and changes over time of nine ADLRD. An additional goal was to obtain clinical correlations and relate our findings to all previously published case reports describing ADLRD.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Spain 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 56 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 18%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 15%
Other 7 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Other 13 22%
Unknown 10 17%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 38%
Neuroscience 8 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Computer Science 2 3%
Chemical Engineering 1 2%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 18 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 July 2015.
All research outputs
#7,644,087
of 27,976,776 outputs
Outputs from Multiple Sclerosis Journal
#1,900
of 4,036 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,227
of 180,724 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Multiple Sclerosis Journal
#14
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,976,776 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,036 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,724 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.