↓ Skip to main content

Goodness-of-Fit Tests for Open Capture-Recapture Models

Overview of attention for article published in Biometrics, June 1985
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Goodness-of-Fit Tests for Open Capture-Recapture Models
Published in
Biometrics, June 1985
DOI 10.2307/2530865
Authors

Kenneth H. Pollock, James E. Hines, James D. Nichols

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
Brazil 2 3%
France 1 1%
Unknown 72 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 25 32%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 25%
Professor 6 8%
Other 5 6%
Student > Bachelor 4 5%
Other 14 18%
Unknown 4 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 51 66%
Environmental Science 17 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 1%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 1%
Physics and Astronomy 1 1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2009.
All research outputs
#8,537,346
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Biometrics
#512
of 1,915 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,716
of 9,455 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biometrics
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,915 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 9,455 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.