You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Factors Leading to Different Viability Predictions for a Grizzly Bear Data Set
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Conservation Biology, February 2002
|
| DOI | 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1996.10030863.x |
| Authors |
L. Scott Mills, Stephen G. Hayes, Calib Baldwin, Michael J. Wisdom, John Citta, David J. Mattson, Kerry Murphy |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 237 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 10 | 4% |
| United States | 4 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 2% |
| Spain | 3 | 1% |
| India | 3 | 1% |
| Czechia | 2 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Bulgaria | 1 | <1% |
| Turkey | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 7 | 3% |
| Unknown | 201 | 85% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 71 | 30% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 35 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 22 | 9% |
| Other | 21 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 17 | 7% |
| Other | 47 | 20% |
| Unknown | 24 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 140 | 59% |
| Environmental Science | 58 | 24% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 3 | 1% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 29 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2018.
All research outputs
#3,654,166
of 24,692,658 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Biology
#1,667
of 3,984 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,527
of 47,545 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Biology
#21
of 161 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,692,658 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,984 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 47,545 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 161 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.