↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
54 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
reddit
2 Redditors

Readers on

mendeley
135 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
‘Normal’ hearing thresholds and fundamental auditory grouping processes predict difficulties with speech-in-noise perception
Published in
Scientific Reports, November 2019
DOI 10.1038/s41598-019-53353-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 54 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 135 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 135 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 27%
Researcher 22 16%
Student > Master 13 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 4%
Professor 4 3%
Other 11 8%
Unknown 44 33%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 25 19%
Psychology 15 11%
Engineering 11 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 5%
Other 15 11%
Unknown 55 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 63. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2026.
All research outputs
#863,507
of 34,621,659 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#9,145
of 184,996 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,497
of 411,139 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#240
of 4,603 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,621,659 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 184,996 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 411,139 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,603 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.