↓ Skip to main content

Efficient myotube formation in 3D bioprinted tissue construct by biochemical and topographical cues

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Materials, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
136 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
199 Mendeley
Title
Efficient myotube formation in 3D bioprinted tissue construct by biochemical and topographical cues
Published in
Clinical Materials, November 2019
DOI 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.119632
Pubmed ID
Authors

WonJin Kim, Hyeongjin Lee, JiUn Lee, Anthony Atala, James J Yoo, Sang Jin Lee, Geun Hyung Kim

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 199 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 199 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 34 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 17%
Student > Bachelor 20 10%
Researcher 13 7%
Student > Postgraduate 10 5%
Other 25 13%
Unknown 64 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 38 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 26 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 5%
Chemistry 8 4%
Other 32 16%
Unknown 71 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 October 2022.
All research outputs
#6,758,664
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Materials
#4,039
of 10,752 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#137,071
of 471,675 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Materials
#29
of 93 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,752 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 471,675 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 93 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.