The winner of the JOSPT Reviewer of the Year Award was Szu-Ping Lee, PT, PhD, who performed with consistent excellence across 3 categories: (1) willingness to serve the Journal by conducting reviews, (2) insightfulness and constructiveness of the reviews, and (3) promptness of turnaround. We are very grateful to all of the many reviewers who served the Journal during 2015 by providing excellent, timely, and constructive reviews, and thank and congratulate Dr Lee in particular for consistently providing high-quality peer reviews for JOSPT and the authors who submit their work to the Journal. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2016;46(5):315-316. doi:10.2519/jospt.2016.0107.
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2016.
All research outputs
#17,527,810
of 27,383,327 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy
#2,033
of 2,511 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#174,864
of 313,314 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy
#38
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,383,327 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,511 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.8. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,314 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
