The sources of error in electronic structure calculations arising from the truncation of the one-particle and n-particle expansions are examined with very large correlation consistent basis sets, in some cases up through valence 10-zeta quality, and coupled cluster methods, up through connected quadruple excitations. A limited number of full configuration interaction corrections are also considered. For cases where full configuration interaction calculations were unavailable or prohibitively expensive, a continued fraction approximation was used. In addition, errors arising from corevalence and relativistic corrections are also probed for a number of small chemical systems. The accuracies of several formulas for estimating total energies and atomization energies in the complete basis set limit are compared in light of the present large basis set findings. In agreement with previous work, the CCSD(T) method is found to provide results that are closer to the CCSDTQ and full configuration-interaction results than the less approximate CCSDT method.
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2020.
All research outputs
#23,299,790
of 34,364,397 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Chemical Physics
#12,811
of 24,300 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#207,820
of 233,072 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Chemical Physics
#57
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,364,397 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,300 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 233,072 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
