↓ Skip to main content

Smooth muscle cell–specific fibronectin-EDA mediates phenotypic switching and neointimal hyperplasia

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Clinical Investigation, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Smooth muscle cell–specific fibronectin-EDA mediates phenotypic switching and neointimal hyperplasia
Published in
Journal of Clinical Investigation, November 2019
DOI 10.1172/jci124708
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 49 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 10%
Other 3 6%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Professor 3 6%
Other 7 14%
Unknown 22 45%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Unspecified 1 2%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 22 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 December 2019.
All research outputs
#6,679,905
of 26,525,642 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Investigation
#8,908
of 17,545 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#130,493
of 484,494 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Investigation
#88
of 138 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,525,642 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,545 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.0. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 484,494 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 138 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.