↓ Skip to main content

Variation in the Management of Persistent Pulmonary Hypertension of the Newborn: A Survey of Physicians in Canada, Australia, and New Zealand

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Perinatology, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Variation in the Management of Persistent Pulmonary Hypertension of the Newborn: A Survey of Physicians in Canada, Australia, and New Zealand
Published in
American Journal of Perinatology, April 2012
DOI 10.1055/s-0032-1310523
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Despite advances in management of persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn (PPHN), the risk of mortality and adverse neurological sequelae remains high. Characterizing variation in practices is a crucial step toward improved patient outcome.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 4%
Switzerland 1 2%
Unknown 48 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 16%
Other 5 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 10%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Lecturer 3 6%
Other 11 22%
Unknown 15 29%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 45%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Linguistics 1 2%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 16 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2012.
All research outputs
#15,243,120
of 22,664,644 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Perinatology
#1,762
of 2,373 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,683
of 161,627 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Perinatology
#6
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,664,644 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,373 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 161,627 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.