↓ Skip to main content

The role of psychological symptoms and social group memberships in the development of post‐traumatic stress after traumatic injury

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of Health Psychology, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
123 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The role of psychological symptoms and social group memberships in the development of post‐traumatic stress after traumatic injury
Published in
British Journal of Health Psychology, April 2012
DOI 10.1111/j.2044-8287.2012.02074.x
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The costs associated with traumatic injury are often exacerbated by the development of post-traumatic stress symptoms. However, it is unclear what decreases the development of post-traumatic symptoms over time. The aim of the present research was to examine the role of psychological symptoms and social group memberships in reducing the development of post-traumatic stress symptoms after orthopaedic injuries (OIs) and acquired brain injuries (ABIs).

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 123 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 118 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 23 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 8%
Student > Bachelor 10 8%
Researcher 10 8%
Other 18 15%
Unknown 34 28%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 42 34%
Arts and Humanities 9 7%
Social Sciences 7 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 3%
Other 17 14%
Unknown 37 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2022.
All research outputs
#1,962,146
of 24,717,821 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Health Psychology
#201
of 877 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,553
of 167,306 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Health Psychology
#1
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,717,821 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 877 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 167,306 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.