↓ Skip to main content

How stable are Parkinson's disease subtypes in de novo patients: Analysis of the PPMI cohort?

Overview of attention for article published in Parkinsonism & Related Disorders, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
169 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
How stable are Parkinson's disease subtypes in de novo patients: Analysis of the PPMI cohort?
Published in
Parkinsonism & Related Disorders, April 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2016.04.027
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

To determine the frequency and stability over time of the subgroup characterization of the tremor dominant (TD) versus postural instability gait disorder dominant (PIGD) Parkinson's disease (PD) in de novo patients. There is a substantial body of literature on the clinical sub classification of PD into TD versus PIGD subtype. However, there are limited data on the stability of this classification especially in early disease. Parkinson's Progression Markers Initiative (PPMI) is a longitudinal case control study of de novo, untreated PD participants at enrollment. Participants undergo a number of assessments including the Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS). TD versus PIGD subtype was defined based on the previously published formula. We report one-year analysis data. 320 of 423 PD recruited subjects had data on subtype classification at year 1 and were included in the analysis. 228 (71%) were classified as TD, 56 (18%) as PIGD and 36 (11%) as indeterminate at baseline. At 12 months, 39% PIGD and 18% TD shifted subtypes: 29% PIGD shifted to TD and 11% to Indeterminate; 10% TD shifted to PIGD and 8% to Indeterminate. The classification was not affected by the dopaminergic treatment (p = 0.59). TD versus PIGD subtype classification has substantial variability over first year in PD de novo cohort specifically for PIGD subtype. Dopaminergic therapy does not impact the change of the PD subtype. This instability has to be taken into consideration specifically when establishing correlations with the biomarkers and for long term prognostication.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 169 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Unknown 165 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 29 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 15%
Student > Master 24 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 7%
Other 11 7%
Other 27 16%
Unknown 41 24%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 21%
Neuroscience 34 20%
Psychology 12 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 6%
Engineering 6 4%
Other 19 11%
Unknown 52 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2018.
All research outputs
#3,583,518
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Parkinsonism & Related Disorders
#523
of 3,101 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,531
of 313,365 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Parkinsonism & Related Disorders
#15
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,101 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,365 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.