↓ Skip to main content

Collective modes of massive Dirac fermions in armchair graphene nanoribbons

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Collective modes of massive Dirac fermions in armchair graphene nanoribbons
Published in
Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, December 2012
DOI 10.1088/0953-8984/25/4/045303
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

We report the plasmon dispersion characteristics of intrinsic and extrinsic armchair graphene nanoribbons of atomic width N = 5 using a p(z)-orbital tight binding model with third-nearest-neighbor (3nn) coupling. The hopping parameters are obtained by fitting the 3nn dispersions to those of an extended Hückel theory. The resultant massive Dirac fermion system has a band gap E(g) ≈ 64 meV. The extrinsic plasmon dispersion relation is found to asymptotically approach a universal dispersion curve as the chemical potential μ increases, whereas the intrinsic plasmon dispersion relation is found to have both energy and momentum thresholds. We also report an analytical model for the extrinsic plasmon group velocity in the q → 0 limit.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Japan 1 13%
Unknown 7 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 38%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 25%
Other 1 13%
Student > Bachelor 1 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 13%
Other 0 0%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 6 75%
Unknown 2 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 December 2012.
All research outputs
#5,309,705
of 28,841,988 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter
#274
of 6,189 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,752
of 302,845 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter
#3
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,841,988 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,189 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 302,845 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.