↓ Skip to main content

Functional Consequences of ROMK Mutants Linked to Antenatal Bartter's Syndrome and Implications for Treatment

Overview of attention for article published in Human Molecular Genetics, June 1998
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Functional Consequences of ROMK Mutants Linked to Antenatal Bartter's Syndrome and Implications for Treatment
Published in
Human Molecular Genetics, June 1998
DOI 10.1093/hmg/7.6.975
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The antenatal variant of Bartter's syndrome is an autosomal recessive kidney disease characterized by polyhydramnios, premature delivery, hypokalemic alkalosis and hypercalciuria. It is genetically heterogeneous, having been linked recently to mutations in an ATP-sensitive, renal outer medullary K+channel, ROMK, and earlier to mutations in the Na-K-2Cl co-transporter, NKCC2. We characterized four of the mutations reported in three heterozygous ROMK variants of antenatal Bartter's and found that each expressed a distinct phenotype in Sf9 cells. One mutation expressed normal function and appears to be an allelic polymorphism. The other three mutations produced channels with significantly reduced K+fluxes. However, the mechanisms in each case were different and reflected abnormalities in phosphorylation, proteolytic processing or protein trafficking. The different mechanisms may be important in the design of appropriate therapy for patients with this disease.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 6%
United States 1 3%
Unknown 29 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 25%
Other 4 13%
Student > Bachelor 4 13%
Researcher 4 13%
Professor 3 9%
Other 5 16%
Unknown 4 13%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 38%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 16%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 6%
Psychology 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 4 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 May 2016.
All research outputs
#22,759,802
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Human Molecular Genetics
#7,915
of 8,251 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,486
of 33,274 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Molecular Genetics
#38
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,251 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 33,274 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.