↓ Skip to main content

Anesthesia advanced circulatory life support

Overview of attention for article published in Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
15 X users
facebook
8 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
194 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Anesthesia advanced circulatory life support
Published in
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie, April 2012
DOI 10.1007/s12630-012-9699-3
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The constellation of advanced cardiac life support (ACLS) events, such as gas embolism, local anesthetic overdose, and spinal bradycardia, in the perioperative setting differs from events in the pre-hospital arena. As a result, modification of traditional ACLS protocols allows for more specific etiology-based resuscitation.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 194 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Brazil 5 3%
South Africa 2 1%
United States 2 1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 181 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 43 22%
Researcher 21 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 20 10%
Student > Postgraduate 19 10%
Student > Master 16 8%
Other 44 23%
Unknown 31 16%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 149 77%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 2%
Environmental Science 3 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 1%
Unspecified 1 <1%
Other 3 2%
Unknown 32 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 September 2017.
All research outputs
#2,081,788
of 34,323,687 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie
#200
of 3,472 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,658
of 212,475 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie
#2
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,323,687 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,472 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,475 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.