↓ Skip to main content

Natural and Modified (1→3)-β-D-Glucans in Health Promotion and Disease Alleviation

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Reviews in Biotechnology, October 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#19 of 683)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
253 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
214 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Natural and Modified (1→3)-β-D-Glucans in Health Promotion and Disease Alleviation
Published in
Critical Reviews in Biotechnology, October 2008
DOI 10.1080/07388550500376166
Pubmed ID
Authors

Djordje B. Zeković, Stefan Kwiatkowski, Miroslav M. Vrvić, Dragica Jakovljević, Colm A. Moran

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 214 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Uruguay 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 210 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 15%
Student > Master 30 14%
Student > Bachelor 27 13%
Researcher 22 10%
Other 14 7%
Other 30 14%
Unknown 58 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 67 31%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 20 9%
Chemistry 15 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 9 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 4%
Other 29 14%
Unknown 65 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 November 2023.
All research outputs
#1,601,326
of 24,877,044 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Biotechnology
#19
of 683 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,966
of 98,232 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Biotechnology
#3
of 135 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,877,044 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 683 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 98,232 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 135 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.