↓ Skip to main content

Novel 3‑Aminothiazolquinolones: Design, Synthesis, Bioactive Evaluation, SARs, and Preliminary Antibacterial Mechanism

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
4 patents

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Novel 3‑Aminothiazolquinolones: Design, Synthesis, Bioactive Evaluation, SARs, and Preliminary Antibacterial Mechanism
Published in
Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, May 2016
DOI 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.5b01678
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

A series of novel 3-aminothiazolquinolones as analogs of quinolone antibacterial agents were designed and synthesized in an effort to circumvent quinolone resistance. Among these 3-aminothiazolquinolones, 3-(2-aminothiazol-4-yl)-7-chloro-6-(pyrrolidin-1-yl) quinolone 12b exhibited potent antibacterial activity, low cytotoxicity to hepatocyte cells, strong inhibitory potency to DNA gyrase and a broad antimicrobial spectrum including against multidrug-resistant strains. This active molecule 12b also induced bacterial resistance more slowly than Norfloxacin. Analysis of structure-activity relationships (SARs) disclosed that the 2-aminothiazole fragment at the 3-position of quinolone plays an important role in exerting antibacterial activity. Molecular modeling and experimental investigation of aminothiazolquinolone 12b with DNA from a sensitive methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) strain revealed that the possible antibacterial mechanism might be related to the formation of a compound 12b-Cu2+-DNA ternary complex, in which the Cu2+ ion acts as a bridge between the backbone of 3-aminothiazolquinolone and the phosphate group of the nucleic acid.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 52 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 23%
Other 4 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 6%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 21 40%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 12 23%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 4%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 24 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 March 2021.
All research outputs
#11,336,372
of 33,493,714 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
#17,965
of 27,334 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121,513
of 333,059 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
#132
of 184 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,493,714 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 64th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 27,334 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,059 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 184 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.