↓ Skip to main content

Grading the evidence and writing the clinical bottom line

Overview of attention for article published in Veterinary Evidence, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#45 of 256)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Grading the evidence and writing the clinical bottom line
Published in
Veterinary Evidence, December 2019
DOI 10.18849/ve.v4i4.305
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 50%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 13%
Unknown 3 38%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 5 63%
Unknown 3 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 December 2019.
All research outputs
#15,906,307
of 27,626,801 outputs
Outputs from Veterinary Evidence
#45
of 256 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#235,780
of 486,308 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Veterinary Evidence
#2
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,626,801 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 256 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 486,308 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.