↓ Skip to main content

Racial differences in the built environment—body mass index relationship? A geospatial analysis of adolescents in urban neighborhoods

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Health Geographics, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
214 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Racial differences in the built environment—body mass index relationship? A geospatial analysis of adolescents in urban neighborhoods
Published in
International Journal of Health Geographics, April 2012
DOI 10.1186/1476-072x-11-11
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Built environment features of neighborhoods may be related to obesity among adolescents and potentially related to obesity-related health disparities. The purpose of this study was to investigate spatial relationships between various built environment features and body mass index (BMI) z-score among adolescents, and to investigate if race/ethnicity modifies these relationships. A secondary objective was to evaluate the sensitivity of findings to the spatial scale of analysis (i.e. 400- and 800-meter street network buffers).

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 214 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
South Africa 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 204 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 40 19%
Researcher 32 15%
Student > Master 23 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 11 5%
Other 35 16%
Unknown 53 25%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 39 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 35 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 5%
Computer Science 7 3%
Other 45 21%
Unknown 66 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2024.
All research outputs
#5,684,965
of 33,738,238 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Health Geographics
#153
of 715 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,402
of 209,648 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Health Geographics
#4
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,738,238 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 715 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,648 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.