↓ Skip to main content

The µMCTQ: An Ultra-Short Version of the Munich ChronoType Questionnaire

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Biological Rhythms, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
9 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
236 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The µMCTQ: An Ultra-Short Version of the Munich ChronoType Questionnaire
Published in
Journal of Biological Rhythms, December 2019
DOI 10.1177/0748730419886986
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 236 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 236 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 34 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 11%
Researcher 23 10%
Student > Master 17 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 3%
Other 26 11%
Unknown 102 43%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 31 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 21 9%
Neuroscience 10 4%
Engineering 8 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 3%
Other 36 15%
Unknown 122 52%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 June 2024.
All research outputs
#1,445,859
of 33,779,198 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Biological Rhythms
#89
of 848 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,433
of 524,726 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Biological Rhythms
#5
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,779,198 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 848 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 524,726 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.