↓ Skip to main content

Unmet Mental Health Need and Access to Services for Children With Special Health Care Needs and Their Families

Overview of attention for article published in Ambulatory Pediatrics, November 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Readers on

mendeley
116 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Unmet Mental Health Need and Access to Services for Children With Special Health Care Needs and Their Families
Published in
Ambulatory Pediatrics, November 2007
DOI 10.1016/j.ambp.2007.08.001
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Studies suggest that children with disabilities or serious health conditions are vulnerable to mental health problems due to adjustment and limitation problems. The aim of this study was to examine rates and predictors of unmet mental health need among children with special health care needs (CSHCN) and their family members and to determine if race/ethnicity and language are associated with unmet need for the child and family members who have a mental health need attributed to the child's special needs. Data are from the 2001 National Survey of Children with Special Health Care Needs, a nationally representative sample of CSHCN. Rates of unmet need were higher for CSHCN and family members of CSHCN with a chronic emotional, behavioral, or developmental problem (EBDP) compared to CSHCN with a mental health need but not a chronic EBDP. In multivariate analysis controlling for condition impact and demographics, among CSHCN with a chronic EBDP, African-American children had greater odds of unmet need (OR 1.60, 95% CI, 1.12-2.28), and family members of Hispanic children with a Spanish language parent interview had greater odds of unmet need compared to others (OR 4.48, 95% CI, 1.72-11.63). Lacking a personal doctor or nurse was associated with higher odds of unmet need for CSHCN with and without a chronic EBDP. Parents reported prevalent mental health needs of CSHCN as well as family members. Given the importance of family members to the care of CSHCN, research on racial/ethnic disparities in access to perceived needs should focus on children and their family members.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Unknown 114 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 18%
Researcher 20 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 8%
Other 19 16%
Unknown 19 16%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 25%
Social Sciences 22 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 13%
Psychology 10 9%
Arts and Humanities 1 <1%
Other 7 6%
Unknown 32 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 September 2010.
All research outputs
#9,516,022
of 27,782,313 outputs
Outputs from Ambulatory Pediatrics
#53
of 122 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,734
of 99,174 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ambulatory Pediatrics
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,782,313 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 122 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 99,174 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.