↓ Skip to main content

Striatal Volume Contributes to the Prediction of Onset of Huntington Disease in Incident Cases

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Psychiatry, September 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
106 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Striatal Volume Contributes to the Prediction of Onset of Huntington Disease in Incident Cases
Published in
Biological Psychiatry, September 2011
DOI 10.1016/j.biopsych.2011.07.030
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elizabeth H. Aylward, Dawei Liu, Peggy C. Nopoulos, Christopher A. Ross, Ronald K. Pierson, James A. Mills, Jeffrey D. Long, Jane S. Paulsen, PREDICT-HD Investigators and Coordinators of the Huntington Study Group

Abstract

Previous neuroimaging research indicates that brain atrophy in Huntington disease (HD) begins many years before movement abnormalities become severe enough to warrant diagnosis. Most clinical trials being planned for individuals in the prediagnostic stage of HD propose to use delay of disease onset as the primary outcome measure. Although formulas have been developed based on age and CAG repeat length, to predict when HD motor onset will occur, it would be useful to have additional measures that can improve the accuracy of prediction of disease onset.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 5 5%
Russia 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 99 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 21%
Researcher 16 15%
Student > Bachelor 12 11%
Other 8 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 8%
Other 20 19%
Unknown 20 19%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 22%
Neuroscience 21 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 11%
Psychology 9 8%
Engineering 3 3%
Other 10 9%
Unknown 28 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 April 2012.
All research outputs
#21,548,946
of 26,452,360 outputs
Outputs from Biological Psychiatry
#5,887
of 6,731 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,099
of 140,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Psychiatry
#54
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,452,360 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,731 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.8. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 140,090 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.