↓ Skip to main content

Involuntary stepping after chronic spinal cord injury

Overview of attention for article published in Brain, October 1994
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Readers on

mendeley
146 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Involuntary stepping after chronic spinal cord injury
Published in
Brain, October 1994
DOI 10.1093/brain/117.5.1143
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

We investigated a pattern of involuntary lower extremity stepping-like movements which recently appeared in a subject with a 17-year history of neurologically incomplete injury to the cervical spinal cord. The movements were rhythmic, alternating and forceful, involved all muscles of the lower extremities and could be reliably evoked by lying the subject down (supine) and extending his hips. Once in this position, the movements continued spontaneously, in the absence of external sensory perturbations, with a step-cycle duration of approximately 3.5 s (0.3 Hz). This rate could be either increased or temporarily halted by specific sensory inputs. Anaesthetizing the subject's right hip joint, in which we found evidence of pathology, led to a marked attenuation of the stepping movements for a period of approximately 15 min. We believe that a combination of (i) preserved but limited supraspinal tonic facilitation, and (ii) abnormal, perhaps noxious afferent inflow from the subject's right hip to the spinal cord may underlie the appearance of this highly unusual and involuntary movement pattern. The striking similarity between the movement and EMG patterns in this subject and those described in many reports using the surgically reduced cat model suggests that we were witnessing the first well-defined example of a central rhythm generator for stepping in the adult human.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 146 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 9 6%
United Kingdom 3 2%
Spain 2 1%
Portugal 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 128 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 30 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 18%
Student > Bachelor 14 10%
Student > Master 14 10%
Professor 13 9%
Other 24 16%
Unknown 24 16%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 18%
Engineering 25 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 21 14%
Neuroscience 18 12%
Sports and Recreations 11 8%
Other 10 7%
Unknown 35 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2023.
All research outputs
#7,427,208
of 26,005,389 outputs
Outputs from Brain
#4,768
of 7,747 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,090
of 20,767 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brain
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,005,389 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,747 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.1. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 20,767 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them