↓ Skip to main content

Forecasting Preanesthesia Clinic Appointment Duration from the Electronic Medical Record Medication List

Overview of attention for article published in Anesthesia and analgesia, December 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

f1000
1 research highlight platform

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Forecasting Preanesthesia Clinic Appointment Duration from the Electronic Medical Record Medication List
Published in
Anesthesia and analgesia, December 2011
DOI 10.1213/ane.0b013e31823fba9e
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

When scheduling clinic appointments, scheduling patients expected to have different visit durations for different minutes of time reduces patient waiting time and staff idle time. Maintaining an active medication list is an important (and, in the United States, required) component to the meaningful use of electronic medical records. We hypothesized that the count of medications from the medication list would be a better predictor of the time taken by a nurse practitioner to evaluate the patient preoperatively than the American Society of Anesthesiologists' (ASA) physical status and other demographic variables.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Ireland 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 54 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 21%
Student > Master 8 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 12%
Other 5 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Other 12 21%
Unknown 10 17%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Social Sciences 3 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 3%
Computer Science 2 3%
Other 11 19%
Unknown 17 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2012.
All research outputs
#24,786,738
of 34,410,798 outputs
Outputs from Anesthesia and analgesia
#8,832
of 10,901 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#233,257
of 303,719 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Anesthesia and analgesia
#31
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,410,798 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,901 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 303,719 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.