↓ Skip to main content

Regulation of chromatin structure by long noncoding RNAs: focus on natural antisense transcripts

Overview of attention for article published in Trends in Genetics, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
patent
6 patents
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
422 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Regulation of chromatin structure by long noncoding RNAs: focus on natural antisense transcripts
Published in
Trends in Genetics, April 2012
DOI 10.1016/j.tig.2012.03.013
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

In the decade following the publication of the Human Genome, noncoding RNAs (ncRNAs) have reshaped our understanding of the broad landscape of genome regulation. During this period, natural antisense transcripts (NATs), which are transcribed from the opposite strand of either protein or non-protein coding genes, have vaulted to prominence. Recent findings have shown that NATs can exert their regulatory functions by acting as epigenetic regulators of gene expression and chromatin remodeling. Here, we review recent work on the mechanisms of epigenetic modifications by NATs and their emerging role as master regulators of chromatin states. Unlike other long ncRNAs, antisense RNAs usually regulate their counterpart sense mRNA in cis by bridging epigenetic effectors and regulatory complexes at specific genomic loci. Understanding the broad range of effects of NATs will shed light on the complex mechanisms that regulate chromatin remodeling and gene expression in development and disease.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 422 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 5 1%
Germany 5 1%
Portugal 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
France 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Luxembourg 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 401 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 110 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 106 25%
Student > Master 33 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 28 7%
Student > Bachelor 25 6%
Other 68 16%
Unknown 52 12%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 208 49%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 95 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 11 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 1%
Other 21 5%
Unknown 65 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2022.
All research outputs
#2,852,644
of 27,781,301 outputs
Outputs from Trends in Genetics
#467
of 2,480 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,816
of 181,887 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trends in Genetics
#5
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,781,301 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,480 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 181,887 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.