↓ Skip to main content

Increased pressure from rising bubbles as a mechanism for remotely triggered seismicity

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, September 1994
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

q&a
1 Q&A thread

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Increased pressure from rising bubbles as a mechanism for remotely triggered seismicity
Published in
Nature, September 1994
DOI 10.1038/371408a0
Authors

Alan T. Linde, I. Selwyn Sacks, Malcolm J. S. Johnston, David P. Hillt, Roger G. Bilham

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 55 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 32%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 13%
Student > Master 7 13%
Professor 5 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 7%
Other 9 16%
Unknown 6 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 41 73%
Physics and Astronomy 2 4%
Mathematics 1 2%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 10 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2020.
All research outputs
#12,955,227
of 22,867,327 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#81,210
of 91,042 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,704
of 21,571 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#182
of 193 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,867,327 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 91,042 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 99.4. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 21,571 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 193 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.