You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The tangled tale of Kīlauea’s 2018 eruption as told by geochemical monitoring
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Science, December 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1126/science.aaz0147 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Cheryl Gansecki, R Lopaka Lee, Thomas Shea, Steven P Lundblad, Ken Hon, Carolyn Parcheta |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 64 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 12 | 19% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 8% |
| Spain | 3 | 5% |
| Italy | 3 | 5% |
| Greece | 2 | 3% |
| New Zealand | 2 | 3% |
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| Turkey | 1 | 2% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 31 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 38 | 59% |
| Scientists | 25 | 39% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 117 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 21% |
| Researcher | 18 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 6% |
| Lecturer | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 18 | 15% |
| Unknown | 31 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 55 | 47% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 12 | 10% |
| Unknown | 39 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 129. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 September 2022.
All research outputs
#321,750
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Science
#8,621
of 82,917 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,685
of 473,189 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#138
of 842 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 82,917 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 65.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 473,189 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 842 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.