↓ Skip to main content

Global knowledge gaps in acute febrile illness etiologic investigations: A scoping review

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
143 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Global knowledge gaps in acute febrile illness etiologic investigations: A scoping review
Published in
PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, November 2019
DOI 10.1371/journal.pntd.0007792
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 143 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 143 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 10%
Researcher 14 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 8%
Student > Bachelor 10 7%
Other 8 6%
Other 22 15%
Unknown 64 45%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 8 6%
Social Sciences 5 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Other 21 15%
Unknown 69 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2020.
All research outputs
#10,593,132
of 34,528,520 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
#5,520
of 11,463 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#139,144
of 409,521 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
#80
of 165 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,528,520 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,463 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 409,521 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 165 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.