↓ Skip to main content

トリプルネガティブ乳癌の治療戦略

Overview of attention for article published in Official Journal of the Japan Association of Endocrine Surgeons and the Japanese Society of Thyroid Surgery, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#32 of 135)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
トリプルネガティブ乳癌の治療戦略
Published in
Official Journal of the Japan Association of Endocrine Surgeons and the Japanese Society of Thyroid Surgery, May 2013
DOI 10.11226/jaesjsts.29.4_293
Authors

紅林 淳一

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 May 2021.
All research outputs
#8,145,365
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Official Journal of the Japan Association of Endocrine Surgeons and the Japanese Society of Thyroid Surgery
#32
of 135 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,784
of 205,373 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Official Journal of the Japan Association of Endocrine Surgeons and the Japanese Society of Thyroid Surgery
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 135 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 205,373 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them