↓ Skip to main content

Autism in Vietnam: The Case for the Development and Evaluation of an Information Book to be Distributed at the Time of Diagnosis

Overview of attention for article published in Issues in Mental Health Nursing, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
71 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Autism in Vietnam: The Case for the Development and Evaluation of an Information Book to be Distributed at the Time of Diagnosis
Published in
Issues in Mental Health Nursing, April 2012
DOI 10.3109/01612840.2011.653039
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ko Chung Ying, Graeme Browne, Marie Hutchinson, Andrew Cashin, Bui Vu Binh

Abstract

Autism is not generally well understood by the community in the West or in Asia. A diagnosis of autism is distressing for all families. When families receive the diagnosis they are often not able to fully appreciate what it means or process the information given to them. Booklets exist in English that contain relevant autism related information but few have been evaluated. In Vietnam, parents do not have ready access to autism related information. This paper makes the case for offering a Vietnamese language information resource/booklet for parents to be distributed at the beginning of the diagnostic process and evaluating its usefulness. In developed countries autism has been recognised since the 1940s (Kanner, 1943). More recently it is being increasingly recognised in children with average and above intelligence. In Vietnam, a Western view of autism is just developing. Consequently community resources are undeveloped. The community, in general, and health services for children, in particular, have a rudimentary understanding of autism. This paper discusses a Western understanding of autism, autism in Vietnam, and suggests one possible strategy for addressing the educational needs around autism in Vietnam.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Australia 1 1%
Unknown 70 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 15%
Student > Bachelor 7 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 8%
Researcher 6 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Other 12 17%
Unknown 25 35%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 13 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 11%
Social Sciences 6 8%
Arts and Humanities 2 3%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 28 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 July 2023.
All research outputs
#23,524,526
of 33,779,198 outputs
Outputs from Issues in Mental Health Nursing
#774
of 1,121 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#150,631
of 209,103 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Issues in Mental Health Nursing
#6
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,779,198 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,121 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.4. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,103 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.