↓ Skip to main content

Efficacy and Safety of Dabrafenib in Pediatric Patients with BRAF V600 Mutation–Positive Relapsed or Refractory Low-Grade Glioma: Results from a Phase I/IIa Study

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Cancer Research, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
135 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
84 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Efficacy and Safety of Dabrafenib in Pediatric Patients with BRAF V600 Mutation–Positive Relapsed or Refractory Low-Grade Glioma: Results from a Phase I/IIa Study
Published in
Clinical Cancer Research, December 2019
DOI 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-19-2177
Pubmed ID
Authors

Darren R. Hargrave, Eric Bouffet, Uri Tabori, Alberto Broniscer, Kenneth J. Cohen, Jordan R. Hansford, Birgit Geoerger, Pooja Hingorani, Ira J. Dunkel, Mark W. Russo, Lillian Tseng, Kohinoor Dasgupta, Eduard Gasal, James A. Whitlock, Mark W. Kieran

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 84 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 10%
Other 7 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 7%
Student > Bachelor 4 5%
Other 14 17%
Unknown 34 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 13%
Neuroscience 4 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Other 12 14%
Unknown 33 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 April 2023.
All research outputs
#1,171,777
of 24,564,172 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Cancer Research
#789
of 13,049 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,752
of 470,010 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Cancer Research
#29
of 201 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,564,172 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,049 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 470,010 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 201 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.