↓ Skip to main content

Preoperative Radiation Therapy Significantly Increases Patient Eligibility for Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation Using 3D-conformal Radiotherapy

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Clinical Oncology: Cancer Clinical Trials, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Preoperative Radiation Therapy Significantly Increases Patient Eligibility for Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation Using 3D-conformal Radiotherapy
Published in
American Journal of Clinical Oncology: Cancer Clinical Trials, June 2013
DOI 10.1097/coc.0b013e3182467ffd
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Three-dimensional-conformal radiation (3D-CRT) is the most common approach used in National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) B-39 for accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI). Administration of APBI-3D-CRT in the preoperative (preop) setting has been shown to decrease the planning target volume. The impact of this decrease on patient eligibility for APBI has not been evaluated in a comparative manner.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 31%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 23%
Librarian 2 15%
Other 1 8%
Lecturer 1 8%
Other 2 15%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 54%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 23%
Computer Science 2 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 May 2013.
All research outputs
#10,602,391
of 34,559,526 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Clinical Oncology: Cancer Clinical Trials
#487
of 2,187 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,897
of 240,941 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Clinical Oncology: Cancer Clinical Trials
#5
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,559,526 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,187 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,941 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.