↓ Skip to main content

Inverted Electron-Hole Alignment in InAs-GaAs Self-Assembled Quantum Dots

Overview of attention for article published in Physical Review Letters, January 2000
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
3 patents
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
194 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Inverted Electron-Hole Alignment in InAs-GaAs Self-Assembled Quantum Dots
Published in
Physical Review Letters, January 2000
DOI 10.1103/physrevlett.84.733
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

New information on the electron-hole wave functions in InAs-GaAs self-assembled quantum dots is deduced from Stark effect spectroscopy. Most unexpectedly it is shown that the hole is localized towards the top of the dot, above the electron, an alignment that is inverted relative to the predictions of all recent calculations. We are able to obtain new information on the structure and composition of buried quantum dots from modeling of the data. We also demonstrate that the excited state transitions arise from lateral quantization and that tuning through the inhomogeneous distribution of dot energies can be achieved by variation of electric field.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 194 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Germany 2 1%
Russia 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Egypt 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 185 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 62 32%
Researcher 33 17%
Student > Master 25 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 13 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 5%
Other 28 14%
Unknown 24 12%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 133 69%
Engineering 14 7%
Materials Science 13 7%
Chemistry 3 2%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 <1%
Other 2 1%
Unknown 28 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2026.
All research outputs
#4,580,084
of 30,529,933 outputs
Outputs from Physical Review Letters
#11,998
of 45,858 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,738
of 131,206 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Physical Review Letters
#14
of 117 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 30,529,933 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 45,858 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 131,206 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 117 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.