↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Risk factors for acute liver allograft rejection and their influences on treatment outcomes of rescue therapy in living donor liver transplantation
Published in
Clinical Transplantation, July 2016
DOI 10.1111/ctr.12760
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Several clinical factors are reportedly correlated with acute cellular rejection (ACR) after liver transplantation. However, the factors that determine the response to rescue therapies remain unclear. A prospective database of 413 consecutive adult patients who underwent living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) was reviewed. Ninety-nine (24%) patients developed ACR after LDLT. A multivariate analysis revealed that a positive T-lymphocytotoxic test (odds ratio [OR], 3.85; P = 0.017), HLA-DR mismatch (OR, 2.99; P = 0.013), autoimmune disease (OR, 2.61; P = 0.001), and a younger recipient age (OR, 0.60 for +10 years; P < 0.001) were independent risk factors for ACR. Among these, autoimmune disease was significantly correlated with refractoriness to the standard rescue therapy (53% vs. 30%, P = 0.02) and relapse of cellular rejection (34% vs. 16%, P = 0.04). After rescue therapy, 98/99 (99%) patients eventually recovered from ACR and graft loss was observed in only one patient. None of the risk factors for ACR impaired both graft survival and overall survival after LDLT. Autoimmune liver disease is associated with refractoriness to rescue therapy for ACR and the relapse of rejection. However, ACR does not affect the long-term outcomes of LDLT if it is well controlled. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 5 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 11%
Student > Postgraduate 3 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 7%
Researcher 2 7%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 9 33%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 37%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Computer Science 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 10 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 May 2016.
All research outputs
#22,012,573
of 24,561,012 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Transplantation
#1,305
of 1,541 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#319,047
of 362,366 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Transplantation
#19
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,561,012 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,541 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,366 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.