↓ Skip to main content

Cephalometric oropharynx and oral cavity analysis in Chiari malformation Type I: a retrospective case-control study.

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neurosurgery, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
2 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Cephalometric oropharynx and oral cavity analysis in Chiari malformation Type I: a retrospective case-control study.
Published in
Journal of Neurosurgery, May 2016
DOI 10.3171/2016.1.jns151590
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

OBJECTIVE Traditionally, Chiari malformation Type I has been related to downward herniation of the cerebellar tonsils as a consequence of an underdeveloped posterior cranial fossa. Although the common symptoms of Chiari malformation Type I are occipital headaches, cervical pain, dizziness, paresthesia, and sensory loss, patients often report symptoms related to pharyngeal dysfunction such as choking, regurgitation, dysphagia, aspiration, chronic cough, and sleep disorders. In addition, tracheal intubation is often difficult in these patients. The purpose of this study was to analyze the morphological features of the oropharynx and oral cavity in patients with Chiari malformation Type I to help identify underlying anatomical anomalies leading to these debilitating symptoms. METHODS Seventy-six adult patients with symptomatic Chiari malformation Type I with cerebellar tonsillar descent greater than 5 mm below the foramen magnum and a small posterior cranial fossa and 49 sex-matched controls were selected to perform a retrospective case-control MRI-based morphometric study in a tertiary hospital. Eleven linear and areal parameters of the oropharyngeal cavity on midsagittal T1-weighted MRI were measured and the average values between patients and control cohorts were compared. Correlations between variables showing or approaching statistical significance in these structures and posterior cranial fossa measurements related with the occipital bone were sought. RESULTS Significant differences were detected for several oropharynx and oral cavity measures in the patient cohort, primarily involving the length and thickness of the soft palate (p = 9.5E-05 and p = 3.0E-03, respectively). A statistically significant (p < 0.01) moderate correlation between some of these variables and posterior cranial fossa parameters was observed. CONCLUSIONS The existence of structural oropharyngeal and oral cavity anomalies in patients with Chiari malformation Type I was confirmed, which may contribute to the frequent occurrence of respiratory and deglutitory complications and sleep disorders in this syndrome.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 47 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 11%
Researcher 5 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Other 9 19%
Unknown 15 32%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 9%
Engineering 3 6%
Unspecified 2 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 16 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 July 2016.
All research outputs
#28,639,288
of 34,410,315 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neurosurgery
#8,060
of 8,770 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#262,539
of 336,501 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neurosurgery
#70
of 94 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,410,315 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,770 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 336,501 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 94 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.