↓ Skip to main content

High Genetic Diversity of Measles Virus, World Health Organization European Region, 2005–2006 - Volume 14, Number 1—January 2008 - Emerging Infectious Diseases journal - CDC

Overview of attention for article published in Emerging Infectious Diseases, January 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
High Genetic Diversity of Measles Virus, World Health Organization European Region, 2005–2006 - Volume 14, Number 1—January 2008 - Emerging Infectious Diseases journal - CDC
Published in
Emerging Infectious Diseases, January 2008
DOI 10.3201/eid1401.070778
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jacques R. Kremer, Kevin E. Brown, Li Jin, Sabine Santibanez, Sergey V. Shulga, Yair Aboudy, Irina V. Demchyshyna, Sultana Djemileva, Juan E. Echevarria, David F. Featherstone, Mirsada Hukic, Kari Johansen, Bogumila Litwinska, Elena Lopareva, Emilia Lupulescu, Andreas Mentis, Zefira Mihneva, Maria M. Mosquera, Mark Muscat, M.A. Naumova, Jasminka Nedeljkovic, Ljubov S. Nekrasova, Fabio Magurano, Claudia Fortuna, Helena Rebelo de Andrade, Jean-Luc Richard, Alma Robo, Paul A. Rota, Elena O. Samoilovich, Inna Sarv, Galina V. Semeiko, Nazim Shugayev, Elmira S. Utegenova, Rob van Binnendijk, Lasse Vinner, Diane Waku-Kouomou, T. Fabian Wild, David W.G. Brown, Annette Mankertz, Claude P. Muller, Mick N. Mulders

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 44 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 30%
Student > Master 8 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 7%
Other 3 7%
Lecturer 2 5%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 11 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Immunology and Microbiology 9 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 7%
Environmental Science 2 5%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 11 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 December 2019.
All research outputs
#8,040,913
of 25,591,967 outputs
Outputs from Emerging Infectious Diseases
#5,667
of 9,763 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,246
of 169,246 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Emerging Infectious Diseases
#34
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,591,967 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,763 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 46.2. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,246 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.