↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Readers on

mendeley
495 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
A Systematic Review of Organic Versus Conventional Food Consumption: Is There a Measurable Benefit on Human Health?
Published in
Nutrients, December 2019
DOI 10.3390/nu12010007
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 194 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 495 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 495 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 47 9%
Student > Master 38 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 7%
Researcher 34 7%
Other 22 4%
Other 57 12%
Unknown 260 53%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 41 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 41 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 36 7%
Environmental Science 16 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 3%
Other 75 15%
Unknown 272 55%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 871. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 August 2026.
All research outputs
#25,639
of 34,342,227 outputs
Outputs from Nutrients
#99
of 28,002 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#485
of 524,023 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrients
#5
of 680 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,342,227 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 28,002 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 524,023 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 680 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.