↓ Skip to main content

The Ketogenic Diet Is an Effective Adjuvant to Radiation Therapy for the Treatment of Malignant Glioma

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
42 X users
patent
21 patents
facebook
10 Facebook pages
googleplus
3 Google+ users
reddit
15 Redditors
pinterest
1 Pinner
q&a
1 Q&A thread
podcasts
1 podcast

Readers on

mendeley
379 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The Ketogenic Diet Is an Effective Adjuvant to Radiation Therapy for the Treatment of Malignant Glioma
Published in
PLOS ONE, May 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0036197
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The ketogenic diet (KD) is a high-fat, low-carbohydrate diet that alters metabolism by increasing the level of ketone bodies in the blood. KetoCal® (KC) is a nutritionally complete, commercially available 4:1 (fat:carbohydrate+protein) ketogenic formula that is an effective non-pharmacologic treatment for the management of refractory pediatric epilepsy. Diet-induced ketosis causes changes to brain homeostasis that have potential for the treatment of other neurological diseases such as malignant gliomas.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 42 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 379 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 4 1%
Spain 2 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 369 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 59 16%
Student > Bachelor 48 13%
Researcher 46 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 9%
Other 28 7%
Other 60 16%
Unknown 102 27%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 118 31%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 39 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 39 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 29 8%
Neuroscience 15 4%
Other 31 8%
Unknown 108 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 126. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2026.
All research outputs
#420,345
of 34,550,734 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#5,521
of 225,078 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,693
of 212,903 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#68
of 4,008 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,550,734 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,078 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,903 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,008 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.