You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Terrestrial nitrogen cycling in Earth system models revisited
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
New Phytologist, May 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1111/nph.13997 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Benjamin D Stocker, I Colin Prentice, Sarah E Cornell, Taraka Davies-Barnard, Adrien C Finzi, Oskar Franklin, Ivan Janssens, Tuula Larmola, Stefano Manzoni, Torgny Näsholm, John A Raven, Karin T Rebel, Sasha Reed, Sara Vicca, Andy Wiltshire, Sönke Zaehle |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 3 | 19% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 13% |
| Sweden | 1 | 6% |
| United States | 1 | 6% |
| Australia | 1 | 6% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 6% |
| Mexico | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 6 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 50% |
| Scientists | 6 | 38% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 133 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 129 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 32 | 24% |
| Researcher | 28 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 7% |
| Professor | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 18 | 14% |
| Unknown | 28 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 37 | 28% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 37 | 28% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 14 | 11% |
| Engineering | 2 | 2% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | 3% |
| Unknown | 38 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2017.
All research outputs
#3,387,393
of 24,577,646 outputs
Outputs from New Phytologist
#3,216
of 9,224 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,791
of 307,252 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New Phytologist
#49
of 114 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,577,646 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,224 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 307,252 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 114 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.