↓ Skip to main content

The Failure of the Law of Brevity in Two New World Primates. Statistical Caveats.

Overview of attention for article published in Glottotheory, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The Failure of the Law of Brevity in Two New World Primates. Statistical Caveats.
Published in
Glottotheory, April 2013
DOI 10.1524/glot.2013.0004
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Denmark 1 5%
Unknown 21 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 18%
Researcher 4 18%
Student > Master 3 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Student > Bachelor 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 8 36%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 36%
Psychology 2 9%
Linguistics 1 5%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 5%
Unknown 10 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 July 2018.
All research outputs
#22,226,257
of 32,030,936 outputs
Outputs from Glottotheory
#12
of 20 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#161,738
of 236,815 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Glottotheory
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,030,936 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.0. This one scored the same or higher as 8 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 236,815 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.