Passive-dynamic ankle-foot orthoses are commonly prescribed to augment impaired ankle muscle function, however their design and prescription are largely qualitative. One design includes a footplate and cuff, and flexible strut connecting the two. During gait, deflection occurs along the strut, with the greatest deflection at a central bending axis. The vertical location of the axis can affect lower extremity biomechanics. The goal of this study was to investigate the influence of bending axis location on gait performance.
For thirteen participants with unilateral ankle muscle weakness, an additive manufacturing framework was used to fabricate passive-dynamic ankle-foot orthosis struts with central and off-center bending axes. Participants walked overground while electromyographic, kinetic and kinematic data were collected for three different bending axes: proximal (high), central (middle) and distal (low), and the participants indicated their order of bending axis preference after testing. Gait measures and preference effect sizes were examined during six regions of the gait cycle.
A few differences between bending axes were observed: in the first double-leg support peak plantarflexion angle, peak dorsiflexion moment and positive hip work, in the early single-leg support peak knee extension moment and positive ankle and knee work, and in the late single-leg support gastrocnemius activity and vertical ground reaction force impulse. In addition, preference was strongly related to various gait measures.
Despite the observed statistical differences, altering bending axis location did not produce large and consistent changes in gait performance. Thus, individual preference and comfort may be more important factors guiding prescription.
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 June 2016.
All research outputs
#20,656,161
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Biomechanics
#1,719
of 2,241 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#238,590
of 319,076 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Biomechanics
#36
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,241 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,076 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
