↓ Skip to main content

From Gestational Hypertension and Preeclampsia to Atypical Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Obstetrics & Gynecology, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
From Gestational Hypertension and Preeclampsia to Atypical Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome
Published in
Obstetrics & Gynecology, May 2016
DOI 10.1097/aog.0000000000001340
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Preeclampsia is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality during pregnancy. The variability of clinical features suggests that preeclampsia is not a single disease. Atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome, resulting from defective regulation of the alternative complement pathway, is less well known and may be mistaken for preeclampsia. We describe a woman with atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome who was given the diagnosis of gestational hypertension during her first pregnancy and preeclampsia and hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelet count (HELLP) syndrome followed by thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura and hemolytic uremic syndrome during her second pregnancy, before the correct diagnosis of atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome was recognized in the postpartum period of her third pregnancy. The patient was treated with anticomplement therapy and had a rapid improvement. This case illustrates the importance of distinguishing atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome from preeclampsia.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 41 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 17%
Researcher 7 17%
Other 5 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 10%
Student > Bachelor 2 5%
Other 9 22%
Unknown 7 17%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 49%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Other 5 12%
Unknown 9 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2023.
All research outputs
#6,993,321
of 27,364,796 outputs
Outputs from Obstetrics & Gynecology
#5,353
of 11,018 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,871
of 313,280 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Obstetrics & Gynecology
#88
of 144 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,364,796 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,018 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,280 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 144 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.